This is perhaps one of the weakest sentences of the agreement in English. Normally, people say this when they don`t really engage in something, but also don`t see why they should oppose it. Here are some phrases you can use to accept and not accept. You must use these expressions in a discussion activity. This sentence is generally considered a strong, formal and very polite sentence, used for disagreements. As in the case of the agreement, some reports may reveal differences of opinion. One of the frequent is CLAIM: in sentence (a), statements instead of protests would indicate that the declaring author does not agree with the censorship of the film. Other verbs like this are ALLEGE and ASSERT (avoid the informal GO GO AROUND SAYING). The derived affirmation, affirmation and affirmation carry the same proposition.
It is worth saying that silence is not understood as an agreement. If you agree with an opinion or idea, you are expected to say so. This phrase is used if you partially agree with certain points, but maybe you don`t entirely agree. This indicates a very strong convergence. Normally, people don`t take this sentence literally (word for word) and don`t really repeat what they just said. This more complex way of showing differences of opinion is analyzed in detail elsewhere in these pages in 51. Make concessions with “May”. An example is as follows: the expression of partial conformity: z.B. on the one hand.. On the other hand, you are right in a way, but. You may have a point there, but. “I say it with the respect it deserves, but..
is a great way to express disagreement, especially in a professional or formal environment. Display here the author`s approval with Smith`s opinion in a way that SAY or ARGUE does not. It is a very popular verb in academic writing, perhaps because it does not suggest any evidence to the extent that other verbs, such as manifest, establish, clarify, show, prove, and show. Other verbs that appear similar are NOTE and OBSERVE. There are also “action names”, such as indication and observation for similar use (see 131. Using action names). Concordance adjectives can be related to two types of nouns: those that represent the holder of the opinion (for example. B Marx, the partisans) and those who have the opinion (e.g.B. proposal, faith).
You can interpose yourself directly in front of this subject or after with a link (the normal positions of adjectives – see 109th place of an adjective according to its subject). The first example below expresses consent to an opinion holder (note the use of in-ing); the others focus on opinion: One problem with all of these, of course, is that they ask me what may be inappropriate in formal scriptures (see 46. How to avoid “me”, “we” and “you”). Verbs that help avoid me are a specific subgroup of those that contribute to the idea of another writer being reported (so-called “quote” verbs – see 76 . . .